Parents Overeacting? or Dumb P (Part 2)

the story continues...

Parents of Boy A and Boy B finally met.

Facts: The top layer of nail at the bottom of Boy A thumbnail (the area of the white color part at the bottom of the nail) has been peeled. There was no blood whatsover but the hard surface was gone, leaving a soft layer. This happened to both thumbnails.

Boy A parents story: Boy B forcefully using his nail to scrap Boy B nail till the top layer gone. Boy A, being ever a good boy,didn't make a sound and let him scrapped. He even tried to protect Boy B and reluctant to tell the truth when they question him.

Boy B Parents story: Boy B told them Boy A had been scrapping his nail against his tooth until the top layer torn, then he tried to peel it off and failed. Boy A asked for Boy B help and Boy B helped him.

Boy A parents claimed Boy B has twisted the story, and demanded assurance from Boy B parents this would never happen again.

Boy B parents cannot guaranteed it would never happen again. They asked Boy A parents how to scrap a nail surface off?

Lets analayze Boy A story: Using a fingernail to scrap the surface of another fingernail is like using two stone to start a fire: it takes time and skill. Imagine this: Boy B scrapped Boy A fingernail for like what? 20 or 30 minutes before it peels? And changed to other thumb to repeat the same thing? Hello... where was the teacher? A boy doing manicure for one hour and nobody notice?

Let analyze Boy B story: Can a six years old make up a story about scrapping thumbnail against a tooth? Did he sees this over TV? Children's programmes? or from a boy next to him?

So, what is the ending of this?

The Principal would asked Boy B to apologize to Boy A. (Shouldn't the P apologize to both the parents and the boys for doing such a 'great' job?)

And I think it is very graceful of Boy B parents to agree to that so there would be an ending to this.